Excerpt Browser

This page displays the full text of excerpts.  When viewing a single excerpt, its “Share,” “Switch Article,” and “Comment” functions are accessible.

DEUTERONOMY — 23:18 prostitute

DEUT1272 One of the general aspects of Jewish holiness involves not the specific action that is permitted, but, rather, the proper time, place, and purpose surrounding the action. The same action can be wholly or unholy, depending on factors of time, place, and purpose. In fact, the Torah's word for prostitute [this verse] is kideishah, which has precisely the same letters as kedushah, in the same order as the Hebrew word for holiness. Thus, the sexual act itself is neither wholly or unholy. If sex is performed with a stranger for money, it is abhorrent in Judaism and unholy. The same act with one's spouse at the correct time of the month converts a person into a partner with God in the creation process, the holiest actor of all.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

DEUTERONOMY — 23:18 prostitute

DEUT1274 The Torah [this verse] calls the prostitute kideishah, from the same root word as holiness, kedushah. There is minute difference between the two words (the letters are identical) in that one vowel has three dots instead of two. This very subtle difference in words between a Jewish act of ugliness and a Jewish act of holiness is symbolic of the minute difference between the two in Judaism. It is the same action, but the purpose and context changes it from something holy into something repulsive.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

DEUTERONOMY — 23:25 eat

DEUT1311 The Torah shows compassion for animals in a manner similar to the compassion it shows for human beings. As a matter of fact, there are a number of mitzvot that seem to apply equally to animals and to man. For example, a worker who works in the field collecting food may not be deprived of food as he or she works and may eat (as long as he or she does not put away any to eat later). The Torah understood that a person cannot be asked to be around food all day and then deprive him or her from partaking of that food. (Continued at [[DEUT1429]] Deuteronomy 25:4 muzzle AMEMEI 9].

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

DEUTERONOMY — 25:4 muzzle

DEUT1429 [Continued from [[DEUT1311]] Deuteronomy 23:25 eat AMEMEI 9]. In a similar manner, an animal that works in the field around food may not be muzzled so that it is deprived of eating food. Just as the Jew is commanded to rest on the Sabbath, the Torah goes out of its way to state an animal must also rest on the Shabbat, to equate the animals in this aspect of Shabbat with man (Exodus 20:9-10 in the Ten Commandments).

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

DEUTERONOMY — 25:11 genitals

DEUT1443 If two men are fighting and the wife of one person attempts to protect her husband by killing her husband's adversary, the threatened man may "cut off her hand" [this verse]. The Chinuch (Sefer Hachinuch, Mitzvah #600) explains that if the threatened man is in mortal danger, he may indeed to kill her in self-defense. ... [This is an example of] the legitimacy of self-defense in Jewish thought and affirm[s] the general concept of "if someone comes to slay you, you should slay him first" (Sanhedrin 72a).

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

DEUTERONOMY — 25:11 genitals

DEUT1444 The rabbis, taking their cue from the Torah, instructed that the essence of prayer, the Amidah, be a silent prayer, so that when people enumerated their personal sins, they could not be overheard (Sotah 32b). Jewish law is often more sophisticated and sensitive then courts of the twentieth century. One of the five categories of payment for damages was to be for embarrassment, based on [this] Torah verse. Even though this payment was subjective and according to strict rules of embarrassment (Maimonides, Hilchot Chovel Umazik 3:1 and 3:7), nevertheless, the Talmud (Bava Kamma 90b) states that the "lowest" poor person still was paid for embarrassment since he is a member of the Jewish people, giving him stature and dignity.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

DEUTERONOMY — 25:17 Amalek

DEUT1471 According to the Kabbalah, the Jew is to recite and remember six remembrances each day (the Exodus, Receiving the Torah at Sinai, Amalek's attack, the Golden Calf, Miriam's sin, and Shabbat) (found in most prayer books following the daily morning service). However, the Midrash (Midrash Tanchuma, Ki Tetzei 5) says that of all the remembrances, a person should be most careful about remembering what Amalek did to the Jewish people. But is this applicable today? Does the nation of Amalek exist, and if so, who are they? From the time of Sancherev (Mishnah, Yadayim 4:4), who intentionally intermingled all the peoples of the world, there is no one nation that can be identified as Amalek. However, Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik, attributing this view to his father (and others said his grandfather, Rabbi Chaim Soloveitchik), believes that Amalek's role was filled in the twentieth-century by Hitler and the Nazis (Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik, Theological and Halakhik Reflections on the Holocaust (Hoboken, NJ: Ktav, 1992), p. 98.) This is based on the verse (Exodus 17:6) that the battle between Jews and Amalek will continue from generation to generation. The Midrash (Midrash Tanchuma, Ki Tetzei 11) explains that in each generation, the battle between the Jews and Amalek will be waged. Similarly, Maimonides (Hilchot Melachim 5:4) specifically states that the seven nations have disappeared, while making no corresponding statement about Amalek, implying that the Amalek tribe still exists. That is, anyone who tries to destroy Jews simply because they are Jews, with no other alternative motive (as the original Amalekites did), should be considered in the category of Amalek today. This is based on the verse in Psalm 83 (Psalms 83:5) that speaks about a people who try to destroy the Jews and their remembrance. Based on the definition of Rabbi Soloveitchik, would Hitler and Nazi Germany be classified as Amalek? From Hitler's writings alone and even from his actions at the beginning of the war, it is difficult to ascertain for certain. It is possible, as deranged as it sounds, that Hitler actually believed at the destruction of the Jews would benefit Germany. If that is the case, then his massive killing of Jews, as horrible and morally reprehensible as it might have been, would not classify Hitler as Amalek. However, from his actions in 1943 – 1944, after he was losing the war, we can deduce Hitler's real beliefs. As Nazi Germany began to lose on all fronts, Hitler had an important choice to make. Trains that could. have been used to transport replacement soldiers, weapons, medicine, and food to the German army at the front were used to transport Jews to the death camps. In choosing to use the trains in this manner, Hitler demonstrated his first priority: killing Jews. This clearly shows that Hitler's hatred for Jews was so great that he was willing to sacrifice his own soldiers in order to kill more Jews. This proves that Hitler would be considered Amalek. In a similarly illogical response, in his last speech in the underground bunker before committing suicide, Hitler did not speak much about the war or his dream, but about the Jews, again showing that his overriding desire to destroy Jews was simply because they were Jews. This Amalekite must be remembered and never forgotten, as it says in the Torah [this verse].

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

RSS
First171819202122232425262728293031333536
Back To Top