Excerpt Browser

This page displays the full text of excerpts.  When viewing a single excerpt, its “Share,” “Switch Article,” and “Comment” functions are accessible.

NUMBERS — 25:8 stabbed

NUM309 Having relations with a [non-Jewish] maidservant is similar to the sins that incur death administered by beis din in two ways. [The first way is:] Our Sages z"l, said (Sanhedrin 81b), "A zealous person is permitted to kill one who has intercourse with a non-Jewish woman," as the pasuk says [this verse], "He speared both of them." This means that if one discovers the sinner going astray in public, before he has completed the sinful act--he may kill him the moment he confronts him. This is more severe than all of the offenses that incur death administered by beis din. This is because [in those cases] death can be administered only after the testimony of witnesses and due prior warning, and only by jurisdiction of the Sanhedrin; but this sinner may be killed by whoever finds him, without witnesses or prior warning. [This is also the opinion of Rambam (Hilchot Isurei Bee'ah 12:4); however, Ra'avad disagrees and requires prior warning, and so rules Rema (Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat 425:4)].

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

NUMBERS — 25:8 stabbed

NUM311 There four types of temperament: He who is easily angered and easily pacified, his loss is canceled by his gain. One whom it is hard to anger and hard to pacify, his gain is canceled by his loss. He whom it is hard to anger and easy to pacify, he is a hassid (pious). He whom it is easy to anger and hard to pacify is a wicked person. Pirkei Avot, Perek V, mishnah 14. R. Yonah makes an astute observation: even the pious hassid, in the mishnah's words, does not rule out anger; it is merely hard for him to become enraged. But anger is sometimes required, for the sake of Heaven, as when Pinchas took spear in hand because he saw the prince of a Hebrew tribe vaunting his immorality [this verse]. The reflective Solomon says, "with much wisdom there is much vexation" (Ecclesiastes 1:18). The more we learn and know, the more we can see behind surfaces and illusions, and find conditions and relationships that are inherently wrong, cruel, or perilous. These should arouse deeply-felt opposition and, on occasion, anger. The wiser a human being is, the more sensitive and aware he will be of matters that are unjust, fraught with danger, or stupid. Yet, the mishnah indicates, let the wise man be a hassid and control his anger. R. Yonah concludes with a maxim of the ethical philosophers, "Be not sweet, lest you be swallowed up." In many situations, show anger. If we refuse to react properly after extreme provocation, we run the risk that people will exploit us and take advantage of us, believing us fools and easy marks. Often, in dealing with children, it is wise to make at least a pretense of being angry. The expression of impatience, annoyance or rage has its place. The important thing is that, like the hassid, we should use it as a tool infrequently, only if it is clearly called for. When you no longer need anger, put it away: return to inner calm.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

NUMBERS — 25:11 jealous

NUM314 Only someone with Ahavas Yisroel can be a kanoi (zealous for God's honor). The Torah traces Pinchos' lineage to Aharon, his grandfather. This is to teach us an important lesson. Only someone who is a true lover of the Jewish people, such as Aharon who loved peace and pursued it, can react with zealousness. Because Zimri brazenly committed an immoral act with a Midianite in public, Pinchos killed him. Pinchos' reaction might appear cruel, and could conceivably have been motivated by a tendency toward violence or by personal hatred. If one is a true Ohaiv Yisroel, however, as Pinchos was, we can be sure that he is motivated solely by his great love for the Almighty which transcends all other loves. (Rabbi Chayim Shmuelevitz). Rabbi Chayim of Brisk once said about zealousness: "Both the owner of a house and a cat want to destroy mice. The sole difference lies in their attitudes. The owner really wants to be rid of them. But the cat wants to have mice to attack. The same applies to protests against misdeeds. One must sincerely not want the misdeeds. One should not just use the misdeed as an opportunity to engage in protesting. (Bayos Hazman, p. 58)

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

NUMBERS — 25:12 covenant

NUM317 In verse after verse, God tells us that revenge is to be left only to God. Even though normally Jews are supposed to imitate the ways of God (Deuteronomy 28:9, Nachmanides commentary on Deuteronomy 11:1), the realm of revenge is God's alone. Thus, it states in Psalms that vengeance and revenge belong only to God (Psalms 94:1). ... There is one place in the Torah where God does command the Jews to take revenge, and perhaps this exception proves the rule. When that Midianites confronted the Jewish people in the desert, it is the only time in the Torah when the Jews were attacked spiritually and not physically. God's name was publicly shamed. Therefore, it is possible that this is why only here God asked the Jews to avenge these actions and take revenge upon the Midianites (Numbers 31:1-2). In a related incident, Pinchas took revenge against the Midianite woman and Jewish man who were publicly fornicating as a religious act before the Ba'al Pe'or idol. Pinchas' action caused the plague that killed "only" 24,000 Jews to cease. God immediately praises this act of revenge by Pinchas, and rewards him with the covenant of peace (Numbers 25:7-12). But why is Pinchas praised for taking revenge, if revenge is the exclusive domain of God? The Talmud explains that, indeed, Pinchas was viewed by the Rabbis as wrong and sinful for taking revenge and for doing this act without receiving legal Rabbinic permission (Jerusalem Talmud, Sanhedrin 48b). It is for this reason that God had to "step in" and publicly declare Pinchas as a hero in this specific situation, before the Rabbis put him to death for his actions. But why did God praise Pinchas' action if revenge is not generally considered "Jewish" or in the domain of human beings? Once again, this exception proves the rule. Because in this instance God's name was being desecrated by the idol worship and people were dying as a result, Pinchas was correct to "take the law into his own hands" and avenge this sin against God. But in general, revenge is forbidden by Jews or by human beings.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

NUMBERS — 25:12 friendship

NUM319 Hillel and Shammai received the tradition from them [Sh'mayah and Avtalyon]. Hillel said: Be of the disciples of Aaron, loving peace and pursuing peace, loving people and drawing them near to the Torah. Pirkei Avot, Perek I, mishnah 12. We translate the Mishnah's words rodef shalom as "pursuing peace." But the verb rodef is often understood to denote pursuing with intent to destroy; in other words, persecution. In this vein, then, the passage would mean, "Love peace and persecute peace." Yet this is not at all paradoxical. Often times those who love peace may, for the sake of the Torah, have to be the ones who temporarily disrupt the peace. When one of the leaders of Israel defied Moses and publicly desecrated the name of God by committing gross immorality, Pinchas, a grandson of Aaron, was jealous for the Lord and destroyed the evildoers. He certainly did not uphold peace in its conventional sense. He committed violence and bloodshed. Pinchas did not hesitate to disrupt the "peace" of compromise and appeasement. He refused to be tolerant of evil. Yet the Almighty's award to Pinchas was "Behold, I give him My covenant of peace" [this verse]. Without any hesitation Pinchas destroyed an unreal superficial peace to achieve a genuine peace: a harmonious relationship between God and Israel. This was "a war to end war." We find such occasions in life and in history. We must pray to the Almighty to give us the wisdom to recognize and judge these occasions correctly!

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

RSS
First406407408409410411412413414416418419420421422423424425Last
Back To Top