Excerpt Browser

This page displays the full text of excerpts.  When viewing a single excerpt, its “Share,” “Switch Article,” and “Comment” functions are accessible.

EXODUS — 20:7 clear

EXOD377 The virtues of solitude and the ill effects of association with fools. When a person's soul longs for the company and comraderie of other people, he should reflect on the virtues of solitude and separation from others, and on the ill effects of associating with fools when this is not absolutely necessary. Among the ill effects of companionship with them is ... false and trivial oaths, of which the Creator has said: “God will not allow it to go unpunished” (Shemos 20:7). A pious man once said to his disciples, “The Torah has permitted us to swear truthfully in God's Name; but I advise you not to swear by His Name [at all], either truthfully or falsely. Just say, ‘It is so,’ or ‘It is not so.’” … Another “[consequence of their company] is the obligation to enjoin right conduct and warn against evil, as we were commanded by the Creator when He said: “You must reprove your fellow” (Vayikra 19:17). We are obligated to object to evil in three ways: (1) by striking it with the hand, as manifested in the incident of Zimri and Kazbi; (2) by objecting in words, as Moshe [our Master] did when he said to the wrongdoer, “Why are you striking your fellow?” (Shemos 2:13); and (3) by [objecting] in one's heart, as David, peace be upon him, said: “I hate a crowd of evildoers and will not sit with the wicked” (Tehillim 26:5). If one can intercede with force and does not do so, he is delinquent. If he cannot intercede with force, he should object verbally. And if he cannot object verbally, he should object in his heart. Thus we are bound to object to evildoers under all circumstances, as the uneducated inevitably fall short of filling their duty. When you are alone, however, you are undoubtedly excused from the duty to enjoin good and warn against evil, which is a duty difficult duty to fulfill and discharge, as our Sages, of beloved memory, said: “I doubt if there is anyone in this generation who can accept reproof ... I doubt if there is anyone in this generation who knows how to reprove.” (Arachin 16b).

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

EXODUS — 20:7 swear

EXOD378 If a beis din requires one to take an oath, and that person knows that he has spoken falsely, he must not accept upon himself to take such an oath, declaring, "I will swear"--without any real intention to swear--[merely] in order to intimidate the defendant [i.e., it is forbidden for one to make the pretense of swearing merely to intimidate the defendant into capitulation], as the pasuk says [this verse], "You shall not bear," for this also implies that you must not be willing to accept upon yourself an oath that is in vain. So said our Sages, z"l, (Mechilta 20:7; [similarly,] the Targum of "Do not bear a false report" (Exodus 23:1) is, "Do not accept" [As we have seen in paragraph 42, this is a prohibition not to accept lashon hara from another. Rabbeinu Yonah is proving from the Targum that "to bear" means to accept.] It is[further] forbidden to swear in vain, although he may be swearing truthfully, as the pasuk says [Ibid. 20:7), "You shall not bear the Name of Hashem, your God, in vain"; the Targum of ["in vain"] is "for no reason." Similarly, one who causes another person to swear in vain has committed a grave sin.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

EXODUS — 20:7 swear

EXOD379 In most translations of the Bible, this verse (which begins, "Lo tissa …") is rendered as "you shall not take God's Name in vain," and people often are taught that this commitment means that it is blasphemous to utter God's name in a curse, or that they must write God as God. But the Hebrew word tissa means "carry," and what the verse seems to forbid is using (i.e., carrying) "God's Name" to justify selfish and/or evil behavior. For example, during the 19th-century, it was common for American Southerners to justify their practice of slavery as something approved of by the Bible and by God. But even though the Torah permitted slavery, it hedged it with many restrictions that were ignored and violated in the South, restrictions that made biblical slavery very different from that practiced in 19th-century America. ... Therefore, when Southern clergy tried to justify their practice of slavery with a claim that the Hebrew Bible (what Christians refer to as the Old Testament) and God would have approved of their behavior, they "carried" God's Name in vain, and associated God with heinous acts. From Judaism's perspective, it is a Chillul Hashem [profanation of God's Name-AJL] to associate God with evil; that may well be why God announces that He cannot forgive those who violate the Third Commandment ("the Lord will not clear one who carries His Name in vain"; this verse] The reason would seem to be obvious: when we commit evil acts such as murdering or stealing, we discredit ourselves, but when we do evil in God's Name, we discredit God and alienate people who might otherwise have become drawn to God and religion.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

EXODUS — 20:7 vain

EXOD384 It is a negative commandment not to swear in vain as Scripture says, You shall not take the name of Hashem your God in vain [this verse]. A vain oath is divided into four categories: (1) If one swears to a change in something known; for example, if he swears about a man that he is a woman, or about a stone that it is gold. (2) If he swears to no purpose; for example, he takes an oath about a stone that it is a stone. (3) If he takes an oath to fail to observe a mitzvah. (4) If he swears to do something which is impossible to fulfill; for example, that he will not sleep for three days in a row, or that he will taste no food for seven days in a row. Over every one of these oaths, if he swore it willfully, he should receive whiplashes; and if it was unwitting, he is free of penalty. If someone says a benediction in vain [needlessly] or he utters the name of Heaven [God] to no purpose, he violates the injunction, You shall not take the name, etc.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

EXODUS — 20:7 vain

EXOD382 Do not swear needless oaths. There are four types of such oaths. 1) One denies a self-evident fact (e.g. he swears that a rock is a bird). 2) One attests to a self-evident fact (e. g. swears that a rock is a rock). 3) One swears that he will not perform a mitzvah. 4) One swears to do the impossible (e.g. he will not sleep for three days). We must know and impress upon our awareness that whenever we utter the great and holy Name of Hashem, we must do so with fear, awe and trepidation, for we are saying the Name of the Unique and Almighty God. Hashem forbids needless mention of His Name. Fulfilling this command (i.e., Refraining from needless oaths) will help us better appreciate the significance of uttering His Name, so that fear and awe of Him will be in our hearts and on our faces.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

EXODUS — 20:7 vain

EXOD385 There are four essential elements to repentance: (1) feeling remorse for past sins; (2) desisting from them and renouncing them; (3) confessing them and asking forgiveness for them; (4) undertaking, in one's heart and innermost being, not to repeat them. … When one who has wronged his fellow undertakes never again to wrong him, and shows that he regrets, desists from, and admits his error-- this is the perfect fulfillment of the steps that precipitate his being forgiven, the removal of his guilt, and the cancellation of his punishment. When these four essentials, with their conditions (which we will explain [in the next chapter]) are all found in a penitent, the Creator will forgive his sin and pardon his transgression. If his sin be the sort of which it is said that it will not go unpunished—e.g., swearing [in God's Name] in vain (Shemos 20:7), or adultery (Mishlei 6:29) -- the Creator will lighten the punishment in this world and show him grace in the World-to-Come, and he will be included among the righteous. As it says, “He will come to Tziyon as a Redeemer, to those of Ya'akov who turn from transgression” (Yeshayahu 59:20); “‘If you repent, Israel,’ says God, ‘you will be restored to Me’” (Yirmeyahu 4:1); “If you will repent, I will restore you; you will stand before Me” (ibid. 15:19).

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

EXODUS — 20:7 vain

EXOD383 His son R. Ishmael said: He who avoids involvement with the law rids himself of enmity, robbery, and invalid oath-taking; while he who takes pride in laying down the law is foolish, wicked, and arrogant of spirit. (Pirkei Avot, Perek IV, Mishnah 9) … a Jew should shun litigation and refrain at all costs from involving the "long arm of the law." Even if you have a valid claim against someone, rights that can be enforced, or something "coming to you," do not feel impelled to bring the matter before the beth din, the rabbinic court (much less before a non-Jewish court of law). You need not insist on the letter of the law. There is a higher level of relationship then justice, a higher "law" by which to live: righteousness. The religious Jew should strive to be a hassid, who goes beyond the requirements and stringencies of justice. The hassid does not insist on exacting every last penny due him. He is willing to forgo some of his share, if he will thus avoid controversy. The hassid, as we will read later in Avoth, is the type who can readily say when necessary, "What is yours is yours, and what is mine is yours." (Avoth v 13). As the Sages indicate elsewhere (T.B. Baba Metzi'a 30b), havoc and ruin can befall an entire city or nation if its people ruthlessly insist on rigorous justice in every least matter, and refuse to abide by mercy. To keep a community living and working smoothly, we need the lubricating oil of goodwill; everyone must be ready to act with charity and "give a little." Otherwise friction mounts until the machinery of human relations breaks down and the community destroys itself. If you take to the courts in a fine blaze of righteous anger, at the very least you will arouse resentment and hatred. Even if you win your case, you usually lose something more important: the goodwill of people about you. Furthermore, acquisitiveness is contagious. If you become very demanding and exacting, seeking to protect your own rights and possessions to the last iota, the people with whom you deal will begin to do likewise. Others can play at the game as well as you. Do not force them to. Moreover, there is a possibility that you are wrong in your demands. The facts may not be as you think. Perhaps, through a legal technicality, you will be awarded the money you claim, but in reality you will take what does not belong to you. Sometimes, believing yourself to be right, you will take an oath and make statements that are actually false: in the zealous pursuit of your rights you may "take the name of the Lord your God in vain" [this verse]. Abstain, remove yourself from litigations and lawsuits, says R. Ishmael, and you will remove yourself from hatred, robbery and swearing falsely: from hatred, because you will incur no enmity by hailing people into court; from robbery, for you will take no one's property through faulty or inhumane legal decisions; from false and improper oaths--since outside the courtroom you will not be moved to take an oath by a passionate but erroneous conviction of certainty.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

EXODUS — 20:8 keep

EXOD386 As to the reason why a positive precept has the power to overrule a negative one, the suggestion has been made that the two kinds of precepts appeal primarily two different attitudes in man and involve different motivations. To go out and expend energy and substance in the bidding of one's master is generally prompted by love, which in turn evokes a response of compassion; i.e., the divine attribute of mercy, rachamim. However, to refrain from doing that which is forbidden by one's master is generally prompted by fear, to which God responds with his attribute of justice (din). But since love of God is greater than fear of God, the power of the positive precept is greater than the power of the negative, so that in cases of conflict, the positive overrules the negative [Nachmanides on this verse]. This may also explain why the Torah prescribes penalties of all sorts for violation of the negative precepts while generally no penalties are ordered for nonfeasance or neglecting to perform the positive commands.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

RSS
First190191192193194195196197198200202203204205206207208209Last
Back To Top