Excerpt Browser

This page displays the full text of excerpts.  When viewing a single excerpt, its “Share,” “Switch Article,” and “Comment” functions are accessible.

EXODUS — 2:23 was

EXOD55 It was taught: Because of five things, the Jews were redeemed from Egypt: Because of the "end" as it is written: "And it was in those many days"; because of affliction, as it is written: "And they screamed"; because of their cries, as it is written: "And God heard their cries"; Because of the merit of their fathers, as it is written: "And God remembered His covenant"; because of repentance, as it is written: "And God saw… and God knew" [that they had repented] (Yerushalmi Ta'anith 1:1)

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

EXODUS — 2:24 covenant

EXOD56 The congruence between brit Avraham and the brit at Sinai is striking. They are two covenants, yet one. It is not coincidental that the first declares, "I am YHWH Who brought you out of Ur-Kasdim," and the second opens with "I am YHWH Your God Who brought you out of the land of Egypt." God is the first and enduring constant in the brit. A second binding component of both britot and a common denominator for all the varieties of brit experience is redemption, physical and moral. The people is rescued in body and spirit, or both. A third component of both covenants is the promise of the land after a time of suffering. "They will enslave and torment them.… then they (Israel) Will go forth." The bridge uniting both brit events is [this verse], where God hears Israel's outcry and "remembers his brit with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob."

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

EXODUS — 3:1 drove

EXOD57 A person should go to a wilderness rather than steal from others. Rashi sites the Midrash which relates that Moshe went to the wilderness to remove himself from the possibility of theft; that is, so that the flock should not graze in the fields of others. Shemos Rabbah 2. From this verse we see how careful Moshe was not to transgress the prohibition against stealing. He went to the farthest end of the wilderness to prevent his sheep from trespassing upon and eating from the fields of others. Sometimes a person might use someone else's possession without permission simply because he is too lazy to find that person to ask his permission. Or, a person might something that belongs to another person because he does not want to trouble himself to go out and purchase the item, even though he can afford it. Anything someone uses without permission is stealing, any person should spare no effort to avoid this crime.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

EXODUS — 3:2 bush

EXOD58 Man, consisting of body and spirit, combines both evil and good. His body is the seed of corruption. Considering the senses as evil, sin appears innate in man. As in rabbinic teaching, suffering coming as punishment of sin is good despite its seeming badness, for it disciplines and sobers sinners and their associates. [Schurer, Hist. of Jewish People, Vol. III, p. 376ff]. In [this verse], "the thornbush is not consumed", Yedaiah Haenini takes the word "thornbush" as a symbol of evil. [M. Waxman, Mishle Yisrael, 5364]. Like the thorn on the rosebush, evil is a permanent element in the world, whose goal is goodness.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

EXODUS — 3:2 fire

EXOD59 The two Hebrew words for "in a flame of fire" are Belabbat aish, implying that God wishes us to perform all our duties as His witnesses sincerely and eagerly, with a heart (lev) aflame for righteousness. To illustrate this thought, take the conspicuous part allotted to charitable acts. It is been explained that the reason why the middle one of the three Matzot at the Seder table is broken in two (Yahatz), is to indicate that our aim as Jews should be to halve another's sorrows by practical sympathy and by sharing with him the blessings that a good fortune has brought our way. Further, the half Shekel which each Israelite was asked to contribute towards the mobile Tabernacle in the wilderness and later towards the upkeep of the Tabernacle in the wilderness was an earnest of communal responsibility and a reflection of "the coin of fire" God showed Moses on the Mount. All our actions were to be inspired by a warm heart and a loving consideration for the recipients of our goodwill. One of the reasons advanced for the fact that no blessing is recited when performing an act of kindness, though it is a Mitzvah to do so, is the consideration that the joy in the performance of the Mitzvah may simultaneously cause some pain or shame to the beneficiary. It is an irrevocable principle of Jewish ethics that wherever a good deed involves some discomfort to the object of our kindness, no blessing was to be recited. [Other examples are that no שהחינו blessing is recited by the Mohel at his first circumcision of a child; at the Shehitah of an animal; when donning shoes made of leather; or when counting the Omer. The memories of a Temple destroyed are too bitter to be sweetened by this blessing.]

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

EXODUS — 3:6 hid

EXOD64 When the concept of Jewish modesty is mentioned, most people immediately assume that this is a reference to some sort of dress. They believe that Jewish modesty entails skirts that are usually much longer than the current styles dictate, and the image usually comes to mind of a woman who is dressed with most of her body totally covered. This modern stereotype of Jewish modesty is certainly not what true Jewish modesty stands for, and the reference to clothing depicts only a very small portion of the spectrum of the general concept of modesty in Judaism. The proof that the idea of Jewish modesty cannot possibly be merely a function of clothing is derived from the Talmud (Eruvin 100b), which says that had the Torah not taught the Jewish people modesty, this Jewish concept would have been learned from the cat. Nearly all cats in the world walk around at all times stark naked, devoid of any clothing whatsoever! Therefore, the true meaning of modesty in Judaism could not possibly be related to dress. In addition, there are only two references in the entire Bible to the Hebrew word for modesty, tzinut. One reference (Proverbs 11:1-2) speaks of modesty as a form of wisdom and intelligence, the other, more famous verse, (Micah 6:8), speaks of the way a person should walk with God-modestly. Neither biblical reference has anything remotely to do with clothing. Clearly, then, Jewish modesty is a general concept that affects all parts of a person's life and is not exclusively clothing– related. What, then, it is the Jewish concept of modesty? How can we identify a modest person-in the Jewish sense? And which other concept in Judaism is modesty related to? If we assume that the Hebrew term tzniut and the general idea of modesty are, in some way, connected to the idea of covering up and hiddenness, then the Torah connects the concept of modesty to the concept of holiness. When Moses, as a shepherd, first encounters God by the Burning Bush on Mount Sinai, God informs Moses that the place he is standing upon is holy ground. Moses' first reaction to this statement is that he hides his face. Thus, hiddenness and privacy seems to be the reaction to holiness. This relationship seems to be consistent with many references to Jewish holiness.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

EXODUS — 3:6 hid

EXOD63 … God, as understood in the Jewish tradition, is in part known and in part hidden. God is made known to human beings through revelation and through divine acts in history, but no human being, even Moses, can comprehend God's essence [this verse, 33:20 – 23] Furthermore, the Mishnah declares that one who probes God's essence beyond what God has chosen to reveal to human beings should not have been born, for, as the Jerusalem Talmud explains, to know more about God than the Holy One chooses to reveal is an affront to His dignity. M. Hagigah 2:1 and J. Hagigah 2:1 (8b). If God is to be a model for us, then, we, like God, must take steps to preserve our own privacy. We, then, out of respect for God's commands as articulated in the biblical passages just cited, [to emulate God's ways; Leviticus 19:2 and Deuteronomy 11:22, 13:5] must also respect the privacy of others. Thus these demands are deeply rooted not only in morality but in Jewish theology.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

RSS
First158159160161162163164165166168170171172173174175176177Last
Back To Top