"For Instruction shall come forth from Zion, The word of the L-rd from Jerusalem." -- Isaiah 2:3

Jerusalem

Torah Verses

Excerpt Sources

Complete List of Source Books

Navigate the Excerpts Browser

Before accessing the excerpts, please review a word about copyright.

Are you more of an "I'll dive right in and figure it out" person, or a "Show Me How This Thing Works" person?  If the former, go right ahead and try the excerpts browers on the right side of this page and/or scroll through the excerpts that start below the following information -- although we still suggest reading the information first.  If you are the latter, click here for a video demonstrating the Excerpts Browser. Either way (or both), enjoy! 

This page is recommended for searches limited to specific Torah books, weekly portions (parshiot), chapters, verses, and/or sources (authors). For keyword and/or for exact phrase (including verse and source) searches of the entire excerpts database, we recommend using the Search Engine page.  For broadest results, use both pages and alternative search strategies. 

This page displays the full text of all or "sorted" (filtered) excerpts in the database.  Use the "Torah Verses" and/or "Excerpt Sources" browsers at the right to locate the excerpts associated with your desired Torah book, portion, chapter. verse, or author.  Or, simply scroll through the excerpts, using the "boxes" at the bottom of any page displaying excerpts to "jump" ahead or back. 

Also note that immediately below the chapter, verse, and keyword of each excerpt is a highlighted line comprised of multiple links.  Clicking on any of the links will limit (filter) the excerpts display to the selected category.  

Transcription of excerpts is incomplete.  For current status, please see "Transcribed Sources" on the Search Engine page.  To assist with completion, please see "Contributors" page. 

DEUTERONOMY — 22:1 bring

DEUT1083 Another source of the Pentateuch that shows concern for what we are calling "human dignity" is to be found in the rabbinic inference from the command [this verse]. The rabbis infer that there is a circumstance when one may "hide himself" from the obligation to chase after his neighbor's ox, and that is if he is "an elder or a scholar," because such activity would be beneath his dignity. The accepted interpretation here is that since an elder or a scholar would not suffer this indignity even if his own property were involved, he need not act differently to save another's property. (Bava Metzia 30a-30b. See Rambam, Hilkhot Gezelah ve-Avedah 18:11. The rabbis in Berakhot 19-20 ruled that considerations of Kavod ha-beriyot cannot overrule a biblical negative command but only a rabbinical ordinance or a biblical positive command).

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

DEUTERONOMY — 22:1 brother

DEUT1085 This tells me only of "the ox of your brother." Whence do I derive [as included in the mitzvah] the ox of your foe? From (Exodus 23:4): "The ox of your foe" -- in any event. If so, why is it written [here] "Your brother"? Scripture speaks anent the evil inclination [i.e., Restore not only the oxen of your brother, but even the ox of your foe -- above the protestations of your evil inclination] (Sifrei)

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

DEUTERONOMY — 22:1 ignore

DEUT1088 In Western society, when people hear a story of a person who returns an object of great value, the common reaction is (1) great surprise, (2) a comment about the unusually high moral quality of this individual who returned the object, and (3) a belief that this person should receive some type of reward for acting "beyond the call of duty." Judaism has an entirely different approach and expected level of morality regarding returning lost objects. Unlike Western society, Judaism regards returning found objects as a mitzvah and not merely a good deed (See the chapter "Mitzvot-Commandments" for discussion on the difference between the two). What does this mean? In a Jewish society not only is it not unusual for an object to be returned, but it is the expected norm and is even demanded as a Torah obligation [this verse]. In many societies, there are laws requiring someone to return the found object once it is picked up--you cannot keep it. But no other society except Judaism says that the individual must pick up the lost object to begin with. Judaism says that a person cannot pass by the object and do nothing, and the Torah repeats this commandment for emphasis two verses later. Therefore, a Jew can't say that "it's not my problem" or "let someone else worry about it." A Jew must pick it up. Most people feel more of a moral obligation to pick up and return the lost object if they know the owner. Therefore, the Torah specifically says that even if you do not know the owner, you still must retrieve the lost object (Deuteronomy 22:2).

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

DEUTERONOMY — 22:1 ignore

DEUT1087 "Who is honoured?" asked Ben Zoma (Abot iv. i.) It was a rhetorical question, for he himself knew the only true answer. "He who honors others; as it is said (I Sam. ii. 30): For I will honour them that honor Me, but those that despise Me shall be held in contempt'." The Talmud is emphatic that the honour of others should be a prime concern (Ber. 28b). One is absolved of a command of the Torah if its fulfillment be at the expense of one's own prestige. For though we are told ... [this verse]..., in the case of an old man, a scholar or a woman, the fulfillment of such a command, involving effort and loss of dignity, is not expected (B. Metz. 30a. Cf. Hoshen Mishpat 263. Ber. 43b). Far better than a man throw himself into a burning furnace then put his friend to shame. This opinion is expressed several times in the Talmud (B.M. 59a; Sot. 6a).

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

DEUTERONOMY — 22:1 take

DEUT1092 Not only is it the downtrodden whose cause the Torah champions as part of its insistence on substantive justice but it is all members of society who must be treated justly. The Torah, therefore, includes lengthy lists of civil and criminal laws for society as a whole, (See, for example, Exodus 21-24 and Deuteronomy 20-25) and the later rabbis developed this area of Jewish law extensively, beginning with the Mishnah’s Order Nezikin. The Torah itself, and the Rabbis even more, appreciated the fact that justice, to become a reality in people's lives, could not be left as a pious hope but must rather be translated into concrete norms. By presenting specific cases, both the biblical and rabbinic traditions made the demands of justice clear and binding. It was not enough to require a person who finds a lost object, for example, to return it (as in Deuteronomy 22:1-3). What if not one, but several, people claim it? How shall you determine the real owner? What happens if you cannot? What should you do, on the other hand, if nobody comes forward to claim the object? Must you keep it? If so, for how long? To what extent must you go to publicize that you have it? If it requires care (for example, if it is an animal), must you spend your own money to provide that care? To what extent? May you use the object in the interim? Returning a lost object is a relatively simple demand of justice. But as these questions demonstrate, even a straightforward requirement such as that easily becomes complicated -- and the rabbis, in fact, devoted an entire chapter of the Mishnah and Talmud to this issue (chapter two of Bava Metzi’a) Without that discussion, the Torah’s imperative to return a lost object would remain imprecise and unworkable, demanding, in some understandings too much, and in others, too little to make this aspect of justice part of an ongoing practice within Jewish communal life.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

RSS
First526527528529530531532533534536538539540541542543544545Last
Back To Top