Excerpt Browser

This page displays the full text of excerpts.  When viewing a single excerpt, its “Share,” “Switch Article,” and “Comment” functions are accessible.

LEVITICUS — 19:17 hate

LEV572 Within the heart of man the issue is not merely "to love or not to love" but also "to love or to hate," for the repertoire of human feelings includes the very fierce and destructive negative emotion of hatred. Like its opposite, "love," the feeling of hatred has its roots in biology and represents a man's natural response to certain negative aspects of his situation which evoke in him fear or resentment or revulsion. Like the other emotions, hatred is clearly not all of one piece and is experienced as an entire range of feelings of varying intensities and nuances, from a mild dislike to a cold abhorrence to a raging, passionate detestation. But if hatred, like the other emotions, arises naturally in man, and God created man, then the emotion as such must be accepted as part of the grand design and as playing a needed and legitimate role within the life of man. The morality of Judaism does not condemn the emotion of hatred per se as evil but questions the uses to which it is put or who or what becomes the object of hate. Does the prompting of Jewish morality to love one's fellow man, as contained in the overlapping commands to "Love thy fellow man," and "Love the stranger," and "Love humanity," effectively preclude the legitimation of any sort of hatred for any man? It is interesting to note that Christianity imputes to the "Old Dispensation" the actual teaching of hatred of one's enemies: "You have heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy,'… But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you." Matthew 5:43. The first point that must be made is that the original command to love one's fellow occurs in a set of sentences to which we are commanded not to hate [this and following verse]. While each of these commands is usually considered a separate injunction, they can be read in sequence as advice on how to approach one's enemy, personal or religious. A person has caused you harm or has offended you and the resentment has built up into hatred. You watch your neighbor mindlessly violate the sancta of Judaism and your indignation turns to hatred. The teaching of the Torah is: Do not permit the hatred to fester in your heart. Hate is toxic and if stored within tends to corrode the entire personality. Work through your hatred by "rebuking your neighbor." Tokhachah (reproof) is a process of confrontation and communication. Confront your neighbor and tell him how you have been hurt. Ask him why he is doing to you what appears to be wrong. Try to get him to see how wrong it is. Perhaps you can get him to change. In any event, "Do not bear sin upon him"; i.e., separate the sin, the evil deed, from the person (See Commentary of Abarbanel). As a result of your own verbalization, in which you clarify the true source of the wrong, the hatred can now be vented upon the evil deed rather than the person or can be confined to the evil within the person. ... Having treated the emotion of hatred, the Torah goes on to say that certainly, in no way, should these feelings be permitted to manifest themselves in overt acts of vengeance. On the contrary, you must treat the person you once hated the way you treat yourself--with forgiveness, with indulgence, and with actions denoting benevolence and love.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

LEVITICUS — 19:17 reprove

LEV612 The law of love imposes a responsibility upon the Jew not only for his fellow's material well-being but also for his religious development. Should you observe your neighbor doing something wrong you are commanded to rebuke him. However, the utmost caution must be used not to cause him any shame or embarrassment: "… Thou shall not hate thy brother in the heart; thou shall surely rebuke thy neighbor and not incur any sin because of him"; i.e., do not incur any sin in the process of rebuking him. [Torat Kohanim on this verse].

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

LEVITICUS — 19:18 grudge

LEV638 What constitutes revenge? The Talmud offers the following example: A asks B to lend him a sickle, and B refuses. The following day, B asks A to lend him an ax, and A says, "I will not lend it to you, just as you refused to lend me your sickle.' This is revenge [and is forbidden by the Torah]" (Yoma 23a). ... What constitutes bearing a grudge? A asks B for an ax and B refuses. The following day B says to A, "Lend me your garment," and A answers, "Here is it. I am not like you, who would not lend me what I asked for." This, the Talmud concludes, is bearing a grudge (Yoma 23b). While the Bible's and Talmud's standard (not even reminding someone who mistreated you of his mean-spirited behavior) seems beyond the capacity of most human beings, the fact that the Torah requires us not to bear a grudge means that Jewish law deems it within our capacity. ... "Another possible approach would be for A to say, 'Of course you can borrow my ax. I am curious, however, why you wouldn't lend me your sickle yesterday.' Such an approach forces B to confront his own behavior, and might well increase the likelihood of B realizing he was wrong" (Dr. Isaac Herschkopf; private communication with the author).

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

RSS
12345678910
Back To Top