Excerpt Browser

This page displays the full text of excerpts.  When viewing a single excerpt, its “Share,” “Switch Article,” and “Comment” functions are accessible.

GENESIS — 31:44 pack

GEN1354 When Laban’s search for his idols turns up nothing Genesis 31:33, Jacob unleashes a tirade against him.   Jacob contrasts his own integrity with Laban’s perfidy during their entire twenty-year relationship. Genesis 31:36-42 Only at this point is Laban moved to propose a covenant of peace between himself and Jacob [this verse]. Jacob’s integrity has finally made its impact upon Laban.   The encounter between Jacob and Laban at Gilead brings into sharp relief the contrast between authentic and false integrity.   While Jacob adheres to an objectively verifiable standard of honesty, Laban’s claims are not subject to verification.   Masquerading as a doting father, Laban berates Jacob for depriving him of the opportunity to embrace his daughters and grandchildren before they took leave of him. Genesis 31:28 Laban’s protest that he would have sent off Jacob amidst musical accompaniment amounts to nothing more than an unsubstantiated claim, bordering on mockery in the light of their previous relationship. Genesis 31:27 Finally Laban’s assertion that God commanded him to do Jacob neither good nor evil amounts to another unverifiable claim. Genesis 31:29 The Gilead episode demonstrates that championing the cause of integrity often requires polemics with both attackers and evildoers.  If integrity is to elevate the moral climate of society, its exponent must choose his battles carefully.  The temptation to disprove the charges of an attacker must be resisted if such polemics would divert society’s attention from one’s own honest.   Jacob resists the temptation to explode Laban’s masquerade as a doting father.  To do this, Jacob would only have to relate to Laban Rachel and Leah’s reaction when Jacob asked them to flee with him. “Rachel and Leah answered him, saying: ‘have we any share or heritage left in our father’s house? Are we not regarded as strangers by him? He has sold us, and then used up our money.’” Genesis 31:14-15 A lesser man would have seized the moment for sweet revenge by setting the record straight.  Jacob, however, knows that his prime concern must be to establish his own integrity.   The true feelings of Leah and Rachel toward their father are secondary.   To avoid diverting attention from the central issue, his own integrity, Jacob allows Laban’s self-serving pretense as a doting father to go undisputed.   Jacob, who epitomizes integrity, chooses his battles carefully and is not obsessed with a need to set the record straight as regards his opponent’s wrongdoing.   All this demonstrates that Jacob subjected himself to objectively verifiable standards and formulated his commitments in precise and unequivocal terms.   CASE 26-27

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

GENESIS — 39:9 wicked

GEN1507 Another key to the moral personality is the character trait of hakkarat hatov (gratitude).  In developing this point, let us examine the biblical narrative of Joseph’s struggle in overcoming the wiles of Lady Potiphar, together with the talmudic account of this incident.  [Citing Genesis 39:8-9, 12).  At that moment, his father’s image appeared to him through the window and said, “Joseph, your brothers will have their names inscribed upon the stones of the ephod [the sash of the high priest’s robe], and yours among theirs.   Is it your wish to have your name expunged from among theirs and be called an associate of harlots?” Immediately his bow abode in strength (Genesis 49:24). Y. Yohanan said in the name of R. Meir: [This means] that his passion was subdued. Sotah 36b   What emerges from the preceding descriptions of Joseph’s struggle against sin is the equation of moral turpitude with betrayal.  Joseph made this equation on several levels.  On one level, proceeding from the biblical narrative itself, Joseph equated succumbing to Lady Potiphar with betraying the trust of her husband who was his master.   Logic does not compel that a test of piety be interpreted as a test of loyalty to Potiphar.   Clearly, it was Joseph’s revulsion at being an ingrate that pushed this equation on him.  In other words, Joseph’s deep sense of hakkarat ha-tov (gratitude) to Potiphar personalized his dilemma, tearing him between lust and loyalty.   By force of the talmudic account, Joseph’s moral dilemma is personalized on a different level as well.   Recall that Joseph invokes his loyalty to God as a means of resisting Lady Potiphar’s wiles Genesis 39:9.   But in the moment of truth, this is apparently not enough to deter him from sin.  What provided the extra push for Joseph was the image of his father both admonishing him against sin and reminding him of his destined greatness. In the final analysis, Joseph is deterred from sin by equating succumbing to sin with betraying both his father’s moral teachings and his high hopes for him.   Now, if Joseph merely gave lip service to Jacob’s teachings, what influence could they have had on him once he was no longer under his father’s control? What influence could these teachings have had at the moment Joseph faced the seductive powers of lust and at the same time was convinced that his father thought he was either dead or hopelessly missing?   Overcoming a sin of passion by conjuring up an image of his father could only be efficacious on the assumption that Joseph cherished his father’s moral teachings and harbored a deep sense of gratitude for them.  Hence, for Joseph, hakarrat ha-tov was the link that transformed moral training into virtuous conduct.   CASE 10-11

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

RSS
12
Back To Top