Excerpt Browser

This page displays the full text of excerpts.  When viewing a single excerpt, its “Share,” “Switch Article,” and “Comment” functions are accessible.

DEUTERONOMY — 23:5 meet

DEUT1217 The Torah expresses great condemnation of the citizens of Moab and Ammon, "because they did not meet you [the Israelites] with food and water on your journey after you left Egypt…" [this verse]. In the talmudic discussion of this verse, Rabbi Yochanan comments on the capacity of inhospitality to "repulse those who would otherwise be near, while [timely hospitality] draws near those who would otherwise be distant" (Sanhedrin 103b).

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

DEUTERONOMY — 23:5 meet

DEUT1214 Offering Accommodations to a Stranger. Derech eretz dictates that upon seeing a stranger enter a city, one should ask him whether he has a place of lodging. As the Talmud (Bava Kama 92a) states, "A stranger who comes to town seeking lodging should be questioned concerning lodging, while one who comes to town accompanied by a woman should not be questioned regarding whether she is his wife or his sister. Avimelech the king of the Philistines failed in this; he did make inquiries regarding Sarah's matrimonial status and eventually brought her to his palace. He was then told by Hashem to return Sarah to her husband--otherwise Avimelech would have died, for he should have learned how to receive a stranger coming to his town, and he did not learn." Rashi explains that the words "he should have learned" refer to derech eretz. This teaches us that offering a stranger lodging is an obligation stemming from the principles of derech eretz, and not just a praiseworthy fulfillment of hachnassas orchim. The male descendants of the nation of a Amon and Moav are not permitted to marry a Jewess as a consequence of their failing to come forth and offer bread and water to the Jewish people when they approach their land [this verse].

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

DEUTERONOMY — 23:7 welfare

DEUT1222 The ninth category [of flattery] consists of one who honors the wicked by way of courtesy. He does not speak well of the wicked man and he does not honor him in such a way as to lead others to believe that he respects him, or he will apportion him honor only in the manner that men honor the rich, by way of "preening" and expectation of gain because their ways have prospered and not because of their intrinsic worth. But herein, too, lies sin and wrongdoing, for though it is permitted to honor the rich, it is not so with the wicked. It is permitted to honor the wicked only on the grounds of fear, fear that they will cause injury or loss at a time when they have the upper hand. It was thus permitted to honor them as men honor the powerful, out of fear and fright by standing, deferring, and the like, but it was not permitted to praise them or speak well of them to others. And thus have our Rabbis of blessed memory said (Sotah 41b): "It is permitted to flatter the wicked in this world." And there are some wicked men whom it is not permitted to flatter, as we find in the case of Mordecai, who is told: "Flatter Haman," and who replied [this verse]: "Do not seek their peace or their good." And even when he was told: "Our Rabbis taught that it is permitted to flatter the wicked to keep the peace," he refused to accept it, as it is written (Esther 5:9): "And he did not stand or stir for him." A man should flatter his wife to preserve household harmony; his creditor, that he not press him; and his teacher, that he teach him Torah. And it is a great mitzvah to flatter one's students and friends so that they learn and listen to his words, to accept his rebuke toward the fulfillment of the mitzvos. Similarly, any man that one thinks he can draw to himself to listen to him to fulfill the mitzvos, who will not respond to severity, but who will accept his chastisement if flattered – – it is a great mitzvah to flatter such a man, to extract what is precious from what is base. There are some men who accept chastisement not through rebuke but through gentle speech, as it is written (Koheles 9:17): "The words of the wise, spoken gently, are heard." And there are some who must be rebuked, as it is written (Mishlei 17:10): "A rebuke enters more deeply into an understanding man." And there are some who require stripes, as it is written (ibid. 19:29): "And stripes to the back of fools." And there are some who even blows will not help, as it is written (ibid.17:10): "Than 100 blows to the fool." If so, what can be done with him? There is no remedy for him but banishment.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

DEUTERONOMY — 23:8 abhor

DEUT1223 Don't point to an institution's imperfections as reasons for not acknowledging the good it has done you. The Talmud teaches, "Cast no mud into the well from which you have drunk" (Bava Kamma 92b). Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik taught that if you study at a school, even if you come to disagree with the school's approach later, don't "throw mud at it" and condemn it because of those aspects of the institution with which you now disagree (Rabbi Soloveitchik's teaching is cited in Weiss, Insights, vol. 1, 66). This dictum is relevant as well for those who have changed their religious orientation. For example, some Jews who grow up Orthodox later leave it for other denominations, while others who grow up Reform, Conservative, or unaffiliated later become Orthodox. Such people often speak with bitterness of the movements in which they were raised, but they should also acknowledge whatever good they gained from their earlier experiences. And those who claim that their experience was entirely negative should reflect on what is perhaps the most unusual of the Torah's 613 commandments: "You shall not abhor an Egyptian, for you were a stranger in his land" [this verse]. Although the experience of Egyptian slavery included oppression and the drowning of Israelite newborns, the Israelites were commanded not to hate Egyptians; rather, they were to remember--along with the recollections of slavery--how Egypt originally admitted them (at the time of Joseph), saved them from famine, and treated them with generosity. If we are commanded to remember the good even when mingled with such evil, then we are certainly obligated to recall the good done for us by institutions and denominations with which we later come to disagree.

SHOW FULL EXCERPT

RSS
First91011121314151617192122232425262728Last
Back To Top